Толстой и Витгенштейн об образовании

Tolstoy and Wittgenstein on education

DOI: 10.33979/2587-7534-2023-3-85-92

УДК 141.319.8

Азаров К.В., постдокторальный научный сотрудник, Ph.D., Рейнский Боннский университет Фридриха Вильгельма

Azarov K.V.,, Postdoc, PhD, Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn

Толстой оказал глубокое влияние на Витгенштейна. Оба они разделяли антифундаментальную позицию по многим философским вопросам. Неудивительно, что взгляды Толстого и Витгенштейна на образование сопоставимы. Оба выступали за творческий свободный образовательный процесс. В статье показано толстовское влияние в нерелигиозных сферах витгенштейновской мысли, в частности во взглядах Витгенштейна на образование.

Ключевые слова: антифундаментальный подход; индуктивное обобщение; Витгенштейн; Толстой; философия образования; воспитательное насилие.

Tolstoy deeply influenced Wittgenstein. They both shared an anti-foundationalist position on many philosophical questions. Not surprisingly, Tolstoy and Wittgenstein’s views on education were germane. They both advocated a creative free educational process. The two can be compared to how educational philosophy develops out of anti-foundationalist premises. The article shows the Tolstoyan influence in non-religious spheres of Wittgenstein’s thought, particularly in Wittgenstein’s view on education.

Keywords: anti-foundationalism; inductive generalization; Wittgenstein; Tolstoy; philosophy of education; educational violence.

Список литературы

  1. Anscombe, 1959 – Anscombe, G. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1959, 179 p.
  2. Archambault, 1969 – Archambault, R. Introduction / Tolstoy on Education, (tr.) Leo Wiener, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1969, pp. v–xviii.
  3. Beaney, 2017 – Beaney, M. Wittgenstein and Frege / A Companion to Wittgenstein, (eds.) Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017, 74–91 pp.
  4. Biriukov, 1921 – Biriukov P. Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy: biografiia, vol. 1, Ladyzhnikov: Berlin, 1921, 572 p.
  5. Eikhenbaum, 1969 – Eikhenbaum, B. Nasledie Belinskogo i Lev Tolstoy (1857–1858) / Eikhenbaum, B. O proze. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1969, pp. 125–166.
  6. Frisen, 2017 – Frisen, N. Training and Abrichtung: Wittgenstein as a tragic philosopher of education / Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 49 (1), 2017, pp. 185–186.
  7. Kovalevsky, 2005 – Kovalevsky, M. Mozhno li schitat' Tolstogo prodolzhatelem Russo? / Zh.-Zh. Russo: Pro et Contra, (ed.) A.A. Zlatopolskaya, St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy Press, 2005, pp. 693–702.
  8. Kruglov, 2012 – Kruglov, A. Kant i kantovskaya filosofiya v russkoy khudozhestvennoy literature. Moscow: Kanon R.O.O.I. Reabilitatsiya, 2012, 480 p.
  9. Llinares, 2010 – Llinares, Ch. The early Wittgenstein, Tolstoy’s Kurze Darlegung des Evangelium and Nietzsche’s Der Antichrist / Doubt, Ethics and Religion: Wittgenstein and the Counter-Enlightenment, (eds.) Luigi Perissinotto and Vicente Sanfélix, Frankfurt, Paris, Lancaster and New Brunswick: Ontos Verlag, 2010, 109–131 p.
  10. Luntley, 2015 – Luntley, M. Wittgenstein: Opening Investigations, Chichester: Wiley, 2015, 179 p.
  11. Malcolm, 2001 – Malcolm, N. A Memoir / Ludwig Wittgenstein: a memoir, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 21–84.
  12. Markov, 1862 – Markov E., Theory and Practice of Yasnaya Poliyana school / The Russian Herald, vol. 39, 1862, pp. 149–189.
  13. McGuinness, 1988 – McGuinness B., Wittgenstein: A Life: Young Ludwig, 1889–1921, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: The University of California Press, 1988, 322 p.
  14. Monk, 1991 – Monk, R. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London: Vintage, 1991, 704 p.
  15. Peters and Stickney, 2018 – Peters, M. and Stickney J. Wittgenstein’s Education: A ‘Picture Held Us Captive,’ Singapore: Springer, 2018, 117 p.
  16. Tolstoi, 1892 – Tolstoi, L. Kurze Darlegung des Evangelium, ed. Paul Lauterbach, Leipzig: Reclam, 1892, 232 p.
  17. Tolstoy, 1904 – Tolstoy, L. On Popular Education / Complete Works of Count Tolstoy, vol. 12, (tr.) Leo Wiener, London: J. M. Dent & Co., pp. 251–323.
  18. Tolstoy, 1904 – Tolstoy, L. What is art, New York, tr NA, 1904, 237 p.
  19. Tolstoy, 1953 – Tolstoy, L. Pis'ma, 1863–1872, Sobraniye sochineniy v 90 tomakh, vol. 61, edited by M. A. Tsiavlovskiy and N. D. Pokrovskaya, Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya Literatura. 435 p.
  20. Tolstoy, 1957a – Tolstoy, L. Ispoved' / Sobraniye sochineniy v 90 tomakh, vol. 23, (ed.) N. N. Gusev, Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya Literatura, 1957, pp. 1–59.
  21. Tolstoy, 1957b – Tolstoy, L. Kratkoye izlozheniye yevangeliya / Proizvedeniya, 1882–1898, Sobraniye sochineniy v 90 tomakh, vol. 24, (ed.) N. N. Gusev, Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1957, pp. 801–940.
  22. Tolstoy, 1989a – Tolstoy, L. Vospitaniye i obrazovaniye / Leo N. Tolstoy, Pedagogicheskiye sochineniya, (ed.) I. F. Protchenko, Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989, pp. 207–208.
  23. Tolstoy, 1989b – Tolstoy, L. Pedagogicheskiye zametki i materialy / Leo N. Tolstoy, Pedagogicheskiye sochineniya, (ed.) I. F. Protchenko, Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989, pp. 33–36.
  24. Tolstoy, 1989c – Tolstoy, L. O narodnom obrazovanii / Leo N. Tolstoy, Pedagogicheskiye sochineniya, (ed.) I. F. Protchenko, Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989, pp. 291–339.
  25. Tolstoy, 2003 – Tolstoy, L. Filosofskiy dnevnik. 1901–1910, (ed.) Nikolyukin A. N. Moscow: Izvestia, 2003, 543 p.
  26. Veikshan, 1953 – Veikshan, V. L.N. Tolstoy o vospitanii i obuchenii, Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences), 1953, 145 p.
  27. Wittgenstein, 1967 – Wittgenstein, L. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, (tr.) G. E. M. Anscombe, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The M.I.T. Press, 1967, 204. p.
  28. Wittgenstein, 1999 – Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations, G. E: M. Anscombe (tr.), Oxford and Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1999, 272 p.

Полный текст PDF