ABYSS

DOI: 10.33979/2587-7534-2025-3-17-30

УДК 167/168 (0,75)

Нугаев Р. М., доктор философских наук, профессор, Поволжский государственный университет физической культуры, спорта и туризма, Республика Татарстан, РФ

Rinat M. Nugayev, Prof. Dr., Volga Region State University, Republic of Tatarstan, the Russian Federation

Целью статьи является обоснование утверждения, согласно которому революционные изменения в науке не были обусловлены изобретениями смелых новых парадигм, «посланных Богом» безупречных идей «ex nihilo». Эти прорывы были вызваны постепенными процессами аккомодации, взаимопроникновения и переплетения «старых» исследовательских практик, предшествовавших разрывам. Причина научной революции заключается в столкновении различных «математических проекций природы» (Хайдеггер), каждая из которых является структурированным пучком взаимосвязанных теоретических и экспериментальных практик.

Ключевые слова: генезис, научная революция, математическая проекция природы, Кун, Хайдеггер, Степин.

The aim of the paper is to contend that profound breakthroughs in science were not due to contrivances of brave novel paradigms, “sent by God” immaculate ideas “ex nihilo”. The breakthroughs were caused by the harrowing piecemeal processes of accommodation, interpenetration, and intertwinement of the “old” research practices preceding the breaks. An origin of scientific revolution consists in the clash of diverse “mathematical projections of nature” (Heidegger) each epitomized by a structured bundle of interconnected theoretical and experimental practices.

Keywords: genesis, scientific revolution, math projection of nature, Kuhn, Heidegger, Stepin.

Список литературы

1. Нугаев, 1989 – Нугаев Р. М. Реконструкция процесса смены фундаментальных научных теорий. Казань: изд-во КГУ, 1989.
2. Степин, 2000 – Степин В. С. Теоретическое знание. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.
3. Ariew, 1989 – Ariew R. The phases of Venus before 1610. Studies in History and Philosophy of Physical Science, 1989. P. 18, 81-92.
4. Duhem, 1954 – Duhem P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1954.
5. Fuller, 2020 – Fuller S. Permanent Revolution in Science: a Quantum Epistemology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2020. P. 1-10.
6. Gingerich, 2004 – Gingerich, Owen Jay. The Book Nobody Read. New York: Walker, 2004.
7. Haugeland, 2005 – Haugeland, J. Reading Brandom Reading Heidegger. European Journal of Philosophy, 2005, 13(3). P. 421-28.
8. Heidegger, [1927], 2010 – Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambough. NY: SUNY Press, 2010.
9. Heidegger, [1943], 2001 – Heidegger, Martin. On the Essence of Truth. - In: The Nature of Truth, edited by M. Lynch. The MIT Press, 2001. P. 295-316.
10. Heidegger, [1950], 1972 – Heidegger, Martin. Die Zeit des Weltbildes. - In : Holzwege. Frankfurt: V. Klostermann. Translated as : Heidegger Martin . The Age of the World Picture, 1972.
11. Heidegger,[1950], 1977 – Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
12. Kuhn, 1957 – Kuhn, T.S. The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.
13. Kuhn, [1962], 1970 – Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition, Enlarged. The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
14. Kuhn, 1977 – Kuhn T.S. Objectivity, Value Judgement and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press, 1977. P. 320-339.
15. Kuhn, 2000. – Kuhn, Thomas S. The Road Since Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
16. Lakatos, 1970 – Lakatos, Imre. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. / Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. P. 91-195,
17. Lakatos & Zahar , 1974 – Lakatos, Imre and Elie Zahar . Why did Copernicus’s Research Program Supersede Ptolemy’s? / The Copernican Achievement. University of California, Los Angeles, 1974, ch. P. 168-192.
18. Nugayev, 1999 – Nugayev, Rinat M. Reconstruction of Mature Theory Change: A Theory-Change Model. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999.
19. Nugayev, 2018 – Nugayev, Rinat M. Einstein’s Revolution: A Study in Theory Unification. Sharjah: UAE: Bentham Science Publishers, 2018.
20. Nugayev, 2023 – Nugayev, Rinat M. The Copernican Long-Awaited Breakthrough: Reconciliation of the Blunt Earth Physics and the Immaculate Mathematics of the Skies. Cosmos & History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 2023, 19 (2). P. 255-278.
21. Nugayev, 2024 – Nugayev, Rinat M. The Origin of Scientific Revolutions: The Clash Between Pervasive Research Traditions. Washington DC: Academica Press, 2024.
22. Rouse, 2014 – Rouse, Joseph. Scienti fic Practice and the Scientific Image. - In Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science, edited by Lene Soler, Sjoert Zwart, Michael Lynch, and Vincent Israel-Jost. Chapter 9. L.: Routledge, 2014.

Полный текст PDF